in

New York Times Says to Expect Election Results to Take a While

AP Photo/Andy Barron, File

Expect election results in November to take a while, the New York Times told its readers Friday, a warning that appears to preempt an expectation that Americans should know who wins the presidential election on Election Night.

Before modern technology, close presidential elections often were decided in the early morning of the next day, such as the 1960 presidential election between Robert F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon, which some political experts believe was stolen from Nixon.

Now, in the 21st century, close election results still take a similar amount of time or even longer, depending on the state in question. In 2020, election results were not determined until four days after Election Day.

Americans should not expect to know who won the 2024 presidential election on the night of the election because of “intense security measures required for counting mail-in ballots,” the Times reported:

The Times, however, reassured readers the 2024 results are not expected to take as long as 2020 because “states have improved their procedures for tabulating mail ballots, and election officials across the country have more experience with the process.”

Wendell Husebo is a political reporter with Breitbart News and a former RNC War Room Analyst. He is the author of Politics of Slave Morality. Follow Wendell on “X” @WendellHusebø or on Truth Social @WendellHusebo.

One Comment

Leave a Reply
  1. Of course. To give them time to change the results if President Trump wins. After all the N. Y. Times is one of the biggest propaganda RAGS for the Democrats.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jamie Raskin Latest Democrat to Assault the Constitution, Says Electoral College ‘Can Get You Killed’

Support for Gun Control Ticks Upward in Aftermath of Apalachee High Shooting