in ,

TikTok Removes Content on Birth Control Risks After Media Pressure Campaign

AP Photo/Michael Dwyer, File

In true-to-the-times fashion, alarmism over women’s health and reproduction has led to social media censorship. Following a Washington Post article and pressure campaign, TikTok has removed videos speaking of the risks of hormonal birth control. Yet, there are risks. 

WaPo painted the social media videos as coming from “right-wing” influencers, calling it an “explosion” of misinformation. It critiqued women blaming their weight gain on birth control, warning of long-term fertility risks and mental health issues. The piece also condemned the promotion of “natural methods.”

WaPo’s article boasts of the removal of at least five videos after asking TikTok about their content moderation policies, writing:

The publication continued detailing the content censorship, writing,

Well, some hormonal birth control is known to cause fluid retention, and the package insert for Depo-Provera, an injected contraceptive, informs patients and clinicians that after one year, the average weight gain is 5.4 pounds, and after five years, the average gain is 16.5 pounds.

There is also evidence that birth control can influence who women are attracted to. There are studies about male facial preferences between women who are on the pill and those who aren’t, changes in relationship satisfaction with women who meet their partners while on the pill, and the way women feel about their partners in pregnancy after using hormonal birth control. 

One study’s conclusion:

Candace Owens, a prominent conservative commentator, had a video removed from TikTok in which she referred to birth control pills and IUDs as “unnatural.” Owens claimed to be advocating for women to realize that these methods are not normal and suggested she had heard feedback from women in her audience suggesting that copper IUDs can harm women’s fertility. Aside from the fact that Owens was reprimanded for retelling what commenters had shared with her about their own experiences, WaPo also published that there was no medical evidence to support that IUDs have long-term impacts on fertility.

Except, there is medical evidence, right here:

It says that the rate of infertility after IUD removal may be as high as thirty percent. So, why can’t women discuss this? 

Of course, there are scientific papers available on mood and mental health impacts of hormonal birth control, too.

Here’s one:

Importantly, this study mentions a disconnect between women patients and providers on their experiences and healthcare issues. Social Media influencer Brittany Martinez, who promotes a birth control detox regimen that was removed by TikTok, responded to the article and the censorship with similar sentiments:

As we saw with COVID-19 and social media censorship, the authoritative information often turned out to be neither authoritative nor informative. And now, the health information battlefront has moved to abortion-centrics that dominate public discourse as an orchestrated wedge issue.

I’m not convinced that the information women are discussing is as unfounded, dangerous, or conspiratorial as has been suggested, as I found plenty of reliable information supporting aspects of the experiences women are reporting with birth control. While the left uses the abortion narrative as the piece de resistance of all freedom in America… why do they not allow women to freely discuss their reproductive health and experiences? 

I don’t intend to give reproductive advice here, but I do intend to… let women speak. 

One Comment

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Kamala Throws Israel Under the Bus, Doubles Down on the Dumb With Rafah Comment

Violence Prevention Group Sued After Man is Shot and Killed During Meeting